How does Priestly explore responsibility in An Inspector Calls?

In “An Inspector Calls,” J.B. Priestley explores the theme of responsibility through the characters’ reactions to the Inspector’s investigation into the death of Eva Smith. The play examines how each character contributed to Eva’s demise and how they respond to their actions once they are confronted with the consequences.

The character who bears the most responsibility for Eva’s death is Arthur Birling, a wealthy businessman who fired her from his factory for asking for a pay raise. Birling is portrayed as a selfish and arrogant man who is more concerned with protecting his reputation and status than with the well-being of his employees. He is also shown to be dismissive of socialist ideas and the notion of community responsibility.

In contrast, the Inspector represents the idea of collective responsibility and highlights how each character’s actions, even those seemingly insignificant, can have far-reaching consequences. Through his questioning and revelations, he exposes the hypocrisy and selfishness of the characters, who are forced to confront their complicity in Eva’s death.

Priestley uses the Inspector as a catalyst for change, as he encourages the characters to take responsibility for their actions and recognize the impact they have on others. The Inspector’s final speech emphasizes the importance of social responsibility and how the characters’ actions have contributed to a cycle of exploitation and injustice.

Overall, Priestley explores responsibility in “An Inspector Calls” by examining how each character’s actions contribute to Eva’s death and how they respond to their complicity once it is brought to light. The play highlights the importance of collective responsibility and the need to recognize the impact of our actions on others.